有Lab visit一定要去，會take attendence, 基本上就系介紹一下EE lab然後寫lab report 。
唔好以為無attendence分就好爽，要靚grade肯定系上堂要聽書然後不停jot notes, 好鐘意考上堂講嘅野而且notes無，真系分心一秒都唔惦
The workload is much heavier than it used to be starting from this semester. 1.The content of the course it self is quite interesting and useful, and the instructor had done experiments in the lecture every time.
2.There are quiz over the semester. They are not difficult, but however is kind of stupid in my opinion when your score is in fact the number of keywords you have written.
3.Do pay attention to what they've said during the lab visit since no one has a clue what those machines are for and you are required to produce a mutli-page report with zero knowledge.
4.The presentation was going in the way that I am not expecting. Essentially, the more words you put in your keynote, the higher mark you will get. Professor does not appreciate graphs and pictures as he thinks that is a act of laziness. Put paragraphs in your keynote and be prepared for fundamental questions then you'll nail the final project and presentation.
I personally believe I didn't put more than 3 days of work for the whole semester on this course, as I studied the majority of the content in high school and thus saved me a lot of study time. However, if one hasn't studied the content ,it's still very easy and If I had put a little bit more effort getting an A or A+ shouldn't be that hard.So recommend this course and try to put in abit of effort for a good grade.The group project and coursework matter a lot.
兩次in-class quiz，有mc, true false, 畫圖, long question，long question答到key point就得，自問冇咩溫過書，所以兩次都好似低過mean
Lab visit，會有一堂去ee個lab參觀，參觀完要寫份report，佢要我地寫兩、三版紙，但根本就no idea寫咩，所以都係亂寫
Presentation+Group report，4-6人一組，要同optics有關，group report一組作1500字，都輕鬆
Lab同present又辛苦又多野做...已經無freerider同埋比prof consult左幾次但係都唔高分.. exam一條都唔明..好辛苦
今年改制加咗Exam同lab visit 所以應該冇以前workload禁低
1.Quiz (兩個) Quiz1: 61/81 Quiz2: 65/90
考ppt嘅concept 有理科底嘅應該好易明 冇嘅話上堂專心聽應該都可以明 啊sir解釋得幾清楚 聽唔切/有問題問佢都會幫手
Quiz三四版紙 頭兩版都係考重點concept嘅填充 MC TF 畫圖 後兩版就係長題目 有啲題目可以俾你畫圖說明 所以唔太考grammar 其實都係答到重點字眼就會俾分 就算攞唔哂長題目啲分 有溫書嘅話前兩版都好易執 Quiz嘅分數會email俾你
大概喺sem中/尾 喺上堂最後一個鐘去參觀Lab 有attendance
建議印好佢俾嘅lab visit ppt 到時去邊聽邊抄低prof講嘅嘢
我地係第一年寫 所以都冇sample參考 我就單純intro maintext conclusion 中間加啲我自己喺Lab影嘅圖 啊sir就叫我地去google ppt入面啲關鍵字 加埋visit抄啲資料就應該寫到唔少嘢 我好似4 5版左右
喺佢比嘅題目/自己簡有關嘅題目做Present 我嗰組其實都算幾hea 講下concept,functions, how it works (見到其他組都瘋狂擺啲個ppt全部都係字) 佢會問你問題 睇你究竟明唔明個concept 所以最好真係理解下你present緊咩 唔好直抄直讀
Present完後要交份Group report 其實都係將你present嘅稿打番成作文咁 1500字 4/5人分 其實workload都唔算重
全部長題目 頭兩題係送分題 有溫書就識 後幾題就難啲 我做嗰陣都好冇自信 都最後都A到 所以應該唔洗擔心
總括而言 算係唔錯嘅GE 上堂冇attendance 但係其實Prof.講得好有趣 好多實驗同示範睇 只要唔好食嘢騷擾佢上堂就得 有理科底會易讀啲 冇嘅話認真聽書睇ptt應該都冇問題 Prof.都話好多商科人攞A (利申科工女) 但真係因人而異 我都識得啲商科人睇唔明啲concept 希望幫到你地
EXAM 既concept都唔難 有背note就輕鬆搞掂
話爛grade既人 問心有冇努力過? 唔好諗住GE course就hea過
Group Project 佔60%
1st Quiz 4題長題目
2nd Quiz 都係長題目
PJ 要自己諗題目 無任何限制只需應用到相關概念
Report + Present + Q&A
MID TERM難,同之前唔同晒,變左幾條LONG QUESTION,PRESENTATION正正常常
C+囉咩事? 根本個教授教得唔好又唔清楚. 每次上堂都係照powerpoint讀. 問D TA 問題,佢哋又唔識答. Project想做得好啲,想consult professor 叫佢畀啲意見,又唔肯覆我哋. JEEP! 教又教得唔好但個grade又爛. 邊個想讀呢科, 我真係恭喜你呀!
It is out of every possible expectation that I got a B in this course. With regards to the comments left by those who have studied this course before, it seems that this course awards students with generous grades. BUT IT IS NOT.
The workload is tbf light. No class attendance, except tutorials, is needed. For tutorials, you basically only need to be there and sign ur name and done. For the lectures, they are not really helpful either, so you can basically skip the whole course and just attend the tests, presentation and lab visits, etc.
However, the tests were highly eccentric. Take the first test as an example, MCs were adopted as a means of assessment. However, Pun [the course leader] promised that there would be 45 minutes of exam time. But, he stopped us after 30 minutes had passed. It was highly unfair and no one objected. Even though, most of us could finish the test wfin 30 mins, it was not a valid justification for cutting our test time.
For the 2nd test, long questions were adopted for means of assessment. I remember it was a 2 in 4 choice, you can choose any 2 Q.s out of 4 Q.s to answer. It was not merely asking for definition of concepts, as suggested by previous comments, but some concepts, for example, chromatic dispersion, which was NOT EXPLAINED clearly by Pun AT ALL, or the advantages and disadvantages of optical fibres [Pun only gave us pictures in the concerned slides, without detailed points given for us to ans such Q.s]. The tests were traps.
As to the final report occupying allegedly 60% of the total course marks, I firmly believe that our project at least worth a B+ or an A-, as one of my gpmate got a final grade of A-, and another one got a B+. But then, it seems that as contrary to the course manual, it seems that the tests instead of the project is the decisive factor. When the project is at least a B+/A-, how could I get a B only? Especially, one of my gpmates got a C+. If the project really weighs 60%, this should not happen.
When I informally ask Pun to review my grades, he gave an extremely irresponsible response that all grades must be correct, as the staff should have reviewed the marks before entering them and generate the final grade. He did not even bother to give us the marks distribution even when enquiries are raised. The transparency is low and the course leader's ability and attitude are simply doubtful.
In addition, I would like to mention that after me, acting on behalf of our group, sending the project to Pun, who immediately acknowledged the acceptance of our project, sent an email to my gpmates 2 weeks afterwards alleging that they hadnt submitted the group project report. This is simply a powerful illustration of how highly incompetent Pun is and how much vigilance should one take before enrolling into this course.
Very light workload and really easy to achieve high grade.
兩次quiz, 第一個係20條mc,正常都應該啱18-19條, 好簡單, 第二個係lq, 分高下. 個presentation不太差就ok, report就6個人寫800字.
課程長達12個禮拜，不計出席率（Quiz, Laboratory Visit以及Tutorial除外）
20% Week 7 Quiz 1（約15分鐘，選擇題）
20% Week 10 Quiz 2（約30分鐘，長問題）
30% Week 11/12 Presentation（約10分鐘）
30% Week 13 Final Report（約800字）
〘特事特辦〙由於課程名額爆滿，為了減輕教授工作量，Final Report由每人交一份改為每組交一份，字數大約800字，整份報告不能多於2版A4紙（正常列印，沒有分頁） ，內容就是Presentation時簡報的完整版資料
present 就比d gp mates玩死。
1 project only.
QUIZ 5條lq 沒有MC
pj被carry 上網搵完資料 自己理解打返落report ok
ps: quiz唔太識 預B range 點知A左 多謝chow yuk tak bb
想輕鬆靚grade in ge1342 i trust!
The lecturer is very helpful.
If you understand the concepts taught in lectures, you can get high marks in quizzes.
He can recognise who came to the lecture.
The presentation need to be interesting or something very hard to understand.
Good groupmates are also important.
40% Quiz + 60% Project
2 quizzes：一份quiz大概5條LQ, 有問definition 同 principles, 問得幾仔細下，但完全唔駛計數，上堂聽書有幫助，改得幾鬆手下，因為我有條10-15分漏空唔識答，做好啲可能有A+啩
Presentation(10 mins present + 10 mins Q&A) + Report (at least 1200 words, max. 1500 words)
Attendance: 唔take attendance 但佢上堂會講下quiz嘅嘢，所以佢都好鼓勵人上堂；上堂要靜，否則佢會點你相
內容：主要教光嘅特性，如reflection, refraction, dispersion, diffraction, rainbow formation, polarized rainbow，都會講下 laser, LED, blue-ray；深啲嘅嘢佢會講但唔考，例如energy level, quantum mechanics, just for your reference
Dr. Chow：好好人，有問必答，有心教，會預備好多實驗講解，試過夜晚十點send email去，佢唔駛五分鐘覆返我；上堂唔明你可以問Dr. Chow問到識為止
駛唔駛Physics 底：有會易啲上手，但冇我都覺得唔緊要，Dr. Chow講冇上堂嘅話，本科人都未必識做份quiz，所以比起phy 底，留心上堂較重要
1 individual report + 1 group present + 2 tests
- Easy test (No phy bkgd can handle)
- Report around 800 words, so easy to do that
- low workload, good grade