跳至網頁內容

GE1332 Beauty of Ancient Chinese Architecture

評核項目
  • 不設考試
  • 不設小測
  • 設有個人報告
  • 設有小組研習
開辦學期
2018/19 Sem A 2017/18 Sem A 2016/17 Sem A 2015/16 Sem A 2014/15 Summer 2014/15 Sem A 2013/14 Summer 2013/14 Sem A 2012/13 Sem B
平均工作量
A+ (1)
A (1)
A- (11)
B+ (6)
B (4)
B- (1)
C+ (0)
C (1)
C- (1)
D (0)
Fail (0)
Dropped (0)

26 則留言 撰寫留言

2018/19 Sem A

A-

The course is now revised and there will be a final examination. The course requires Madarin so don't take it if you don't understand Mandarin Chinese. Assignments are quite time-consuming and are not easy any more. About the group project, as the groups are assigned by prof herself, it really depends on your luck that teammates may contain free riders. Although free riders are punished, they definitely will affect your grade if they perform bad in the group presentation. Final is easy and are from the materials.

In all, not recommended.

2018/19 Sem A

C-

No midterm
final 1 hour
2 self assignment & 1 group project (total 70%) - peer assessment so important
Reg this GE with 5 friend, only one B-, all C range
exam easy, just revise notes
but LI SHAN is a trouble people
Group project is difficult to meet Li Shan's standard
Hard to get Good grade

2017/18 Sem A

B

Absolutely boring, but there's not much workload.
Because of being absent-minded in class, I found it hard to grasp the criteria, and thus the grade is very unsatisfactory.

2017/18 Sem A

A-

Very nice course to get a good grade to improve ur GPA. The workload is low since there are only two assignment. The group project has 50% score so u should find some good teammates.

2016/17 Sem A

A-

要做啲咩係下面講晒
成個SEM得兩份功課
基本上CRITERIA SYSTEM要上佢堂先會明佢想要啲咩
POSTER最後出到黎好分得出邊啲有上堂邊啲無
就算有ARCHI學生都唔代表GP會高分, 因為佢可能唔知咩叫CRITERIA SYSTEM
排版用返ARCHI方法排就死硬

2016/17 Sem A

A-

1 individual
1 group pj

Individual 揀一類Chinese architecture 分析beauty criteria, 4頁字 single spacing font12. 都算麻煩因爲要打好多字,但內容都算有野寫既,要用criteria system
Group揀一棟現代建築,用criteria system 分析beauty 9-11個人一組,workload輕。講你個criteria點得出黎 要講survey結果,10分鐘present再整poster,分組好好佢逼你一定要有一個archi Student, cm, engine呢啲分得好平均。每人做到既野都唔同既
基本好多堂都走左 佢show sample個堂要上唔比人影相,最後present兩堂都要上,要比分人地
Li shan有心教學比分都唔hea 但上堂悶英文難聽,有興趣都可以揀 分析下中國唔同建築結構等等

2015/16 Sem A

C

lecturer唔比遲到 遲到會當面罵
搞到無人上堂 但佢又唔計attendence分
但又唔知點解會tick attendence
project個標準一錯就成份玩完
當住全面笑你份野
仲要individual pj(50%) 同gp pj一模一樣,只係對象唔同
即係話
pj玩完=individual玩完=50%+50%無曬88

2015/16 Sem A

B+

If you want to have a good grade in this course, please make sure you know what kind of "criteria" she is looking for in the presentation.
BTW, mentioning what she taught in the lecture will be helpful (although she denied this point).
Overall, I think she did pay effort but somehow the course was still boring. And personally I dont think the assessment is reasonable.

2014/15 Sem A

B-

好難觸摸Dr Li想點,平時d instructions都唔係好明佢講咩,我諗我係比個groupmate拖低左個分,其他groupmate大部份都係C range

2014/15 Sem A

B

- 聽聞我班組員大部分都係 B range。
- 唔知 Li Shan 母語係咩,只知口音好重,成日聽唔明佢D英文。
- 佢有堂會 show 以前學生的 individual essay 良文比我地睇,可以參考。
- 最後幾個 week,無論是否你果組 present 都要全組出席!平日話之你走哂佢。

【關於分組】
話說 Li Shan 想每組都有唔同科的人,原意係好,但一組十幾個人,加上成個 lecture room 過百人,最後搞得好混亂。有人一聽到分組咁煩、就離開課室 drop 科,人數分唔"暈",第一堂根本分唔成組..... 有 D 組要搞成幾 week。有人 drop 就自然會輪到 waiting list 的人入來,所以就算你交左名單上去,Li Shan 都可能派個唔知乜水入你組,或者,佢見你果組太多人讀同一學系、就會調走某些人。總之就煩。

【詳講 gp project】
- 最後幾 week 有組與組之間互評,每組一張分紙,但佢又冇交代互評的比重(話唔定根本冇所謂比重、佢只係用黎參考)
- 互評唔係比 grade only,你要寫幾句交待點解你比呢個 grade 人地,即係你組要有人認真聽其他組 present。
- 同一組入面,都有組員之間的互評。你可寫臭個 free rider,或大讚組員間如何團結,用黎博高分(Li Shan 強調 team work 但唔知佢點定義...)同樣,佢冇交代互評的比重。

2014/15 Sem A

A-

堂走左大半
上左既堂佢都係咁岩GROUP DISCUSSION或者播YOUTUBE
所以基本上冇聽過書

INDIVIDUAL ESSAY同PRESENTATION 50/50
PRESENTATION做得唔係幾好 係咁比佢CHALLENGE (不過大部分組都係咁)
我D GROUPMATES 都係B RANGE

我A RANGE應該係可能INDIVIDUAL做得比較好
記得要參考佢比個SAMPLE黎做(佢上堂會SHOW一SHOW, 最好影低)
同埋都有去圖書館借書做REFERENCE

另外 老師英文有D難明 同埋上堂其實都好嚴 雖然平時唔計ATTENDANCE 但PRESENTATION就算唔係你個組PRE都要成組番齊 早走都當你冇番冇情講
仲有唔比傾計食野...

2013/14 Sem A

B+

老實講, 呢科ge真係好悶
不過勝在唔take attendance同埋少野做
group project 15人一組, 分番開要做既野其實好少
係份personal assignment麻煩d
我自己係elaborate方面比較弱, 所以做時都覺得好吃力
最尾有b+算係咁啦

2013/14 Sem A

B+

成個sem我諗我只係上過3堂左右,仲要除左最後一堂要交功課,我幾乎堂堂都起碼遲到半個鐘。呢科勝在唔洗take attendance,上堂都學唔到咩,個tutor廢廢地,英文都好難聽得明。雖然試過上堂無啦啦抽組出去present,但係我咁啱走左個堂最後都有B+。最麻煩既都已經係individual report同gp project,呢科其實幾hea,又冇exam又冇quiz,想hea住讀GE既reg呢科都唔錯。