跳至網頁內容

GE2101 Rational Thinking and Creative Ideas 理性思考與創意

評核項目
  • 不設考試
  • 設有小測
  • 設有個人報告
  • 設有小組研習
開辦學期
2017/18 Sem B 2017/18 Sem A 2016/17 Sem B 2016/17 Sem A 2015/16 Sem B 2015/16 Sem A 2014/15 Sem B 2014/15 Sem A 2013/14 Sem B 2013/14 Sem A 2012/13 Sem B 2011/12 Summer 2011/12 Sem A
平均工作量
A+ (10)
A (8)
A- (6)
B+ (7)
B (3)
B- (1)
C+ (2)
C (3)
C- (0)
D (0)
Fail (0)
Dropped (0)

40 則留言 撰寫留言

2017/18 Sem A

A

成個course好hea, 成日早走仲有堂睇戲,得三堂會教嘅嘢(Critical thinking)會出喺Quiz度
前面講creative thinking可以不理,同group project都冇乜關係
計分方面,mind map 亂畫都冇乜所謂,個個都咁上下分
Creative blog 就最好認真啲做,最好夠特別,寫吓Apple冇創意之類
Briefing 計5%,唔好太離譜就得
Present 就好緊要,都係嗰句啦,隊友最重要,PowerPoint唔好太多字,用吓啲互動嘅方式,睇吓片咁啦
至於Quiz,唔好靠哂啲lecture notes, 自學睇吓啲Fallacies,睇吓書咁就最好啦。

TL;DR Hea科,好grade,睇logic能力

2016/17 Sem A

A+

Dr Chan is a very nice lecturer but the class is very boring so you likely fall in sleep. Group Project and the final quiz are very important toward the grading. Assignment is not that hard, you can review the lecture note and easily find out the logic and complete the assignment.

2016/17 Sem A

B-

This subject is what others expect to be good grade.
Our grp did super well in project and he praised us good.
I was super confused with this grade. I think it's the tutor problem.
Do not reg this course or you will regret it! 中伏!!!

2016/17 Sem B

B

Workload係幾light 但始終都係critical thinking個d野 唔太易明 走咗幾堂就跟唔到 d人講到呢科好似好正咁 但其實好睇咩人讀 如果比我揀多次 唔會揀cct呢d科

2016/17 Sem B

A+

2 parts: creativity and rationality

For rationality, it was an easy version of Introduction to Logic. 2 MC quiz.

For creativity, 2 presentations on a "creative: business idea or an analysis of a successful leader, 1 blog, 1 mind map.

2016/17 Sem B

A+

哩科GE算係投資低風險極高。Project topic 可以bold啲。好多組別嘅project都係做business ideas,唯獨是毫不creative。Midterm同final嘅T/F 都視乎你有冇背slides。Logic題目可以參考Law School Admission Test (LSAT) Section 2,4同5。而fallacies就不妨睇下readings 同自己search吓online exercises。如果個人英文底子好而個腦冇乜大問題嘅都不妨試下哩科。

P.s. 哩科個grade都可以好爛,唔係純勤力可以應付到。

2016/17 Sem B

A

本身有讀過類似既course,上堂都無咩用,自己睇notes仲好。
final quiz 只需要溫2個lecture既notes,唔洗背書,佢話會出額外既野,要自己上網睇我都無理。
project 視乎groupmate本身有無創意,但present果陣lawrence好似雲遊,好彩最終都有A。

2016/17 Sem A

A-

其實我覺得教嘅野係幾難
好多唔同嘅理論, 理論名都係拉丁文
以前有玩開辯論, 所以覺得都OK, 但係整體黎講覺得教嘅野都難
CREATIVE THINKING佔好少, 果2堂都訓左
教授係用心教, 不過上堂就多數只係講野, 我地聽, 無圖/片睇, 會悶
同埋教授講英文一般, 唔太流暢, 會聽得小小辛苦
不過無咩野做
得一個FINAL QUIZ, 一份PRESENT, 一個ASSIGNMENT
assignment係將段文字嘅邏輯用符號表達
final quiz open book, 我有溫書所以幾得心應手
project有好projectmate, 大家都努力做, 唔洗REPORT 所以都易

2016/17 Sem A

A+

呢科雖然個名有creative thinking,但係creativity其實得一課,rational thinking佔大部分
呢科有1個assignment (4題,全部都係deductive logic嘅題目,可以當溫書用)
有group project,有兩個題目可以揀(都係關creativity嗰課事)
淨係需要present同交present個ppt,唔洗寫written report
(最好present之前約時間搵professor consult,佢啲意見真係有用,同埋present有Q&A Section,所以consult咗起碼有心理準備,同埋填補返啲漏洞)
有一個final quiz(open book quiz,總之係紙嘅嘢都帶得,包括字典)
今年由於professor有一堂無上到,要喺reading week度上返(呢科有reading week),professor為補償(因為可能有同學無上到呢堂),quiz變成有得揀題目,professor話正常係無得揀
quiz嘅題目類似professor俾嗰啲exercise
同埋呢科要take attendance,professor上堂會隨機抽同學問問題check attendance,加上上堂其實都會講幾多例子等同學容易明,所以最好上足堂
btw professor上堂其實幾hea
最後要利申:本身學過logic

2016/17 Sem A

B

成個course workload都真係算低
得一份得4題既asm
一個grp pj (present only, no written report is required)
加一個final quiz (open notes)

個course個人認為最好有少少英文根底去理解啲題目
Dr.Chan上堂幾輕鬆 雖然講野窒窒地 基本上上堂冇乜人理佢個個都自己做自己野 有時覺得佢都幾慘

2016/17 Sem A

A-

平時上堂得廿分鐘到會教書,有時直頭得討論,project唔使research,淨係present就得。佢係我見過最hea嘅老師,但就好nice同靚grade。exam只要溫咗佢兩堂notes就無咩大問題。真係好值得reg

2015/16 Sem B

B+

呢個course好輕鬆
個tutor都好hea
成日上上下堂會唔知走左去邊,跟住3個鐘lecture hea下hea下咁就過左

不過好唔好采group project撞到有兩個伏人,又freeride又deadline fighter又教垃圾
個project做得好差,真係好想屌撚死佢兩個
不過到最後竟然都有B+,真係估佢唔到

2015/16 Sem A

C

個COURSE話就話叫rational thinking and creative ideas, 但佢7成時間都教緊CREATIVE 果PART, Rational thinking 就係最後幾堂講哂佢.
上堂比較悶, 會叫人答問題, 如果叫中你你唔係到就會刪左你個Attendance.