跳至網頁內容

GE2410 English for Engineering

評核項目
  • 不設考試
  • 不設小測
  • 設有個人報告
  • 設有小組研習
開辦學期
2018/19 Sem B 2018/19 Sem A 2017/18 Summer 2017/18 Sem B 2017/18 Sem A 2016/17 Summer 2016/17 Sem B 2016/17 Sem A 2015/16 Summer 2015/16 Sem B 2015/16 Sem A 2014/15 Summer 2014/15 Sem B 2014/15 Sem A 2013/14 Summer 2013/14 Sem B 2013/14 Sem A 2012/13 Summer 2012/13 Sem B 2012/13 Sem A 2011/12 Sem B
平均工作量
A+ (2)
A (4)
A- (13)
B+ (28)
B (19)
B- (12)
C+ (4)
C (1)
C- (0)
D (0)
Fail (0)
Dropped (0)

83 則留言 撰寫留言

2018/19 Sem A

A-

The lecture is boring and stupid, but good grade anyway. This course heavily depends on team project. You would require a team of good teammates, else you die.

2016/17 Sem B

A-

She is a nice tutor, she gives many comments to the assignment. But she doesn't let us leave before the end of the period of lesson. I got B- in UE, but still can get A range in 2410

2018/19 Sem A

C


啲堂無乜用 哂時間
最記得第二堂臨尾個slide播條懶好笑片 之後夠鐘落堂 完全唔知佢要表達啲乜
其餘時間都係照份student booklet讀 或者 即堂做少少野show係個screen 求其up兩句

Presentation part 我唔知佢想要啲乜 明明做足哂份student booklet requirements and recommendations
又話咩presentation要engage audience 要吸引人去黄子華啊笨
之後比最低分我

因為翻左幾堂 覺得無乜用 所以後黎有幾堂無翻
要take attendance堂我只有60% attendance唔知有無影響個grade

2017/18 Summer

B+

Ms Lauw, a Singapore English teacher, seems very nice to all students. However, she prefer gives a high grade to international students. Therefore, local students may not have any benefits in obtaining a high mark from her judgement. She also produces an excuse which tell you that you cannot get a high mark from her judgement (Excuse: Three India students had registered her course and gave three of them A minus in previous semester. Due to this incident, she was blamed by Dr. Becky Kwan.) However, Dr. Becky Kwan expressed to me that there was no incident like that and said that her judgement is like that which show her personality. Scream and horrific!!! If you have register or are preassigned Ms Lauw as your teacher of GE2410, you should change to another teacher because you deserve getting a better grade from another teacher.
My mark allocation:
Task 1:14.9/20
Task 2: 15.3/20
Task 3: 7.4/10
Task 4: 15/20
Task 5: 15.1/20
Attendance(Maybe): 8.5/10
Cut-off mark of B+(Around): 76/100

2017/18 Sem B

A-

Overall workload was okay, mostly group work so choose your group mates wisely.Course is more verbal based as almost 40% of course is oral .Kevin is a great teacher and would often help you out if you face any difficulties .

2017/18 Sem A

B+

Ms Lauw is a very nice and friendly teacher, she is always willing to help students. if you want to get a good grade for this course, show her your work and always ask for her comments.
If you want to learn, she is a good choice since she will carefully mark your works and return to you with comments.
*Do NOT expect get A range for this course.

2017/18 Sem A

B

I am yr1 student. I think the teacher is quite nice. Be honest, I have three marvelous group-mates, they finished most of the difficult parts of the group project. I think you should find some creative group-mates or friends as you need to have a role play as a team in a company. One presentation, one meeting and a few of paper works, quite easy I think. B is fine as my English is bad. Add oil la XD

2016/17 Sem B

B-

成個Course總共有2份Individual Assignment同埋2份Group Work
Individual Assignment佢俾分算手鬆,因為附近既人個分都係差唔多
但Group Work就真係要睇隊友表現
第1個Group Work係Hold Seminar,呢個Tutor唔俾人帶任何稿(Memo/Q-Card/電話......全部都唔俾)
有2個隊友因為未背熟曬份稿,於是將份稿寫係手掌,個Tutor知左,唔知有無扣分
第2個Group Work係整份Blueprint出黎,佢只會係堂上開個Soft Copy Sample俾我睇睇,之後就自己做,唔知係咪因為黑白問題,份野Print出黎之後個設計有D簡單,可能因此扣左分
呢個Tutor好鍾意同外國人傾計,同外國人分組會有著數

2016/17 Sem B

B+

基本上Sem頭chur到Sem尾
明明已經好俾心機做好全部task但出黎個grade都係唔靚
總分大約八九成分數 但tutor就堅持我得某D task係A-分數
Jon對task都有主觀既特登要求 已經做足曬 完全唔明點解會係呢個grade
組員既grade都係差唔多 聽聞隔離組既grade更加爛
唔建議reg呢個tutor
利申:UE A- 讀左咁耐第一次拎低過A range

2016/17 Sem B

A-

無得唔讀 所以唯有搵個好tutor
Jenny 係個好tutor :)
上堂輕鬆 講講下笑就一堂
assignments點做會講到好清楚 基本上聽曬佢講跟住做包靚grade
所以強烈建議大家reg Jenny :)

分組果時搵到好partners就輕鬆
就算英文能力低d都ok 最緊要勤力搭夠
利申:有比partner雷 但最後A-

2016/17 Sem B

B+

Yuki Lam is very nice and kind, but NOT a good instructor.
Even though I attended all the lessons and paid much attention, I could barely know what the task requirements were because Yuki did not give clear instructions (I don't think she knows how to give clear instructions). You may know what to do only if you study the course handbook HUNDRED times. Apart from that her lessons were boring.
Anyway, she is still a teacher giving you quite some constructive advice when you send her your draft essay.